Skip to content
Category

Misuse of statistics

page 1
confirmation bias
tendency of people to favor information that confirms their beliefs or hypotheses
cherry picking
fallacy of incomplete evidence
anecdotal evidence
evidence collected in a casual or informal manner and relying heavily or entirely on personal testimony
cum hoc ergo propter hoc
latin phrase
sampling bias
bias in which a sample is collected in such a way that some members of the intended population are less likely to be included than others
Anscombe's quartet
four data sets with the same descriptive statistics, yet very different distributions
ecological fallacy
logical fallacy
Lies, damned lies, and statistics
phrase describing the use of numbers to bolster weak arguments
misuse of statistics
erroneous use of statistical argument when the statistical reason involved is false or misapplied
data dredging
use of data mining to uncover patterns in data that can be presented as statistically significant
moving the goalposts
phrase originating from goal sports, now describing by metaphor a kind of logical fallacy or debate tactic
regression fallacy
argumentative fallacy
How to Lie with Statistics
non-fiction work by Darrell Huff
Judenzählung
thumb|German Jewish soldiers celebrate Hanukkah, 1916 Judenzählung (, German for "Jew census / counting") was a measure instituted by the Imperial German Army's Oberste Heeresleitung (OHL) in October 1916, during the upheaval of World War I. Designed to confirm accusations of the lack of patriotism among German Jews, the census disproved the charges, but its results were not made public. However, its figures were published in an antisemitic brochure. Jewish authorities, who themselves had compiled statistics that considerably exceeded the figures in the brochure, were denied access to governme
misleading graph
graph that misrepresents data
P-hacking
redirect Data dredging