Skip to content
Category

Inductive fallacies

page 1
confirmation bias
tendency of people to favor information that confirms their beliefs or hypotheses
cherry picking
fallacy of incomplete evidence
anecdotal evidence
evidence collected in a casual or informal manner and relying heavily or entirely on personal testimony
slippery slope
logical fallacy in which a party asserts that a relatively small first step leads to a chain of related events culminating in some significant effect
availability heuristic
tendency and mental shortcut of preferring an item with more available information
blind men and an elephant
parable from the ancient Indian subcontinent, in which several blind men feel and try to conceptualize an elephant
fallacy of composition
fallacy when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole
all horses are the same color
paradox arising from an incorrect proof by mathematical induction
appeal to probability
Fallacy that equates a probable event to a certain one
faulty generalization
process of reaching a conclusion about all or many instances of a phenomenon, on the basis of one or a few instances of that phenomenon
motivated reasoning
form of cognitive bias in which a decision is based upon supporting a desired outcome rather than the preponderance of evidence
McNamara fallacy
making a decision based solely on quantitative observations (or metrics) and ignoring all others
argument from analogy
type of inductive argument, whereby perceived similarities are used as a basis to infer some further similarity that has yet to be observed
overwhelming exception
informal fallacy of generalization
Slothful induction
logical fallacy
Idola tribus
Type of Logical Fallacy
Idola specus
type of logical fallacy
Inductive fallacies — category · Vinony