Category
page 1Relevance fallacies
straw man argument
form of argument and an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent
argument from authority
a form of defeasible argument in which a claimed authority's support is used as evidence for an argument's conclusion
argument from ignorance
logical fallacy that, since proposition has not yet been proven false, it must be true
victim blaming
social phenomenon that responsabilizes the victim of the damage suffered
reductio ad Hitlerum
refutation of a view by comparing it to the Nazi Party
red herring
false clue that misleads or distracts attention away from a relevant or important question
whataboutism
"Whataboutism" or "whataboutery" (as in, "but what about X?") refers to the propaganda strategy of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation instead of offering an explanation or defense against the original accusation. It is an informal fallacy that the accused party uses to avoid accountability—whether attempting to distract by shifting the conversation's focus away from their behaviour or attempting to justify themselves by pointing to the similar behaviour (which may be true or false, but irrelevant) of their opponent or another party who is not the current subject of discussio
irrelevant conclusion
informal fallacy of presenting an argument that fails to address the issue in question
tu quoque
fallacy regarding hypocrisy
gambler's fallacy
mistaken belief that more frequent chance events will lead to less frequent chance events, or vice versa, to balance out
argumentum ad baculum
threat of force to make a conclusion accepted
appeal to nature
argument or rhetorical tactic in which it is proposed that a thing is good because it is “natural”, or bad because it is “unnatural”
appeal to consequences
argument
think of the children
a cliché that evolved into a rhetorical tactic
naturalistic fallacy
ethical argument asserting that it is fallacious to explain something good reductively
genetic fallacy
fallacy of irrelevance that is based solely on someone's or something's history, origin, or source rather than its current meaning or context
fallacy of composition
fallacy when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole
argument from silence
argument based on the absence of statements in historical documents, rather than their presence
argument to moderation
informal fallacy which asserts that the truth can be found as a compromise between two opposite positions
argument from fallacy
the fallacy that, since an argument contains a logical fallacy, its conclusion must be false
fallacy of division
fallacy
base rate fallacy
error in thinking which involves under-valuing base rate information
Chewbacca defense
legal defence where one attempts to deliberately confuse the jury by making use of the red herring fallacy
name-dropping
Name-dropping (or name-checking) is the practice of naming or alluding to important people or institutions in order to indicate one's association with them. The term often connotes an attempt to impress others; it is usually regarded negatively, and under certain circumstances may constitute a breach of professional ethics. It may be done within a conversation, a story, a song, an online identity, or other communication.
special pleading
informal fallacy
accident fallacy
informal fallacy
tone policing
manipulative tactic that focus on the tone in which a statement was presented and in turn detract attention from the truth or falsity of that statement
Bulverism
Bulverism is a rhetorical fallacy that combines circular reasoning, the genetic fallacy and ad hominem with presumption or condescension. The Bulverist presumes that a speaker's argument is false or invalid and then explains why the speaker made that argument (even if said argument is actually correct) by attacking the speaker or the speaker's motive.
etymological fallacy
genetic fallacy that holds that the present-day meaning of a word or phrase should necessarily be similar to its historical meaning
And you are lynching Negroes
Soviet catchphrase
motte-and-bailey fallacy
type of informal fallacy
Two wrongs make a right
philosophical expressions
Moralistic fallacy
type of informal fallacy
Where have you been for eight years?
Russian propagandist slogan
red-baiting
Red-baiting, also known as reductio ad Stalinum () and red-tagging (in the Philippines), is an intention to discredit the validity of a political opponent and the opponent's logical argument by accusing, denouncing, attacking, or persecuting the target individual or group as anarchist, communist, Marxist, socialist, Stalinist, or fellow travelers towards these ideologies. In the phrase, red refers to the color that traditionally symbolized left-wing politics worldwide since the 19th century, while baiting refers to persecution, torment, or harassment, as in baiting.
chronological snobbery
belief that the past is inherently inferior to the present
evidence of absence
evidence of any kind that suggests something is missing or that it does not exist
double-barreled question
type of informal fallacy, when a question touches upon more than one issue, yet allows only for one answer
invincible ignorance fallacy
deductive fallacy
Appeal to the law
type of logical fallacy