Michael Behe
Sign in to saveAlso known as Michael J. Behe, Michael Joseph Behe
American biochemist, author, and intelligent design advocate
Person · Open Library
- Works
- 3
Top works
- Intelligent Design
- A Mousetrap for Darwin
- Science and Evidence for Design in the Universe (Proceedings of the Wethersfield Institute)
via Open Library + Wikidata
Listeners · Last.fm
- Listeners
- 7
- Total plays
- 9
<a href="https://www.last.fm/music/Michael+Behe">Read more on Last.fm</a>
Recent publications · Crossref
5 total works indexed
- Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
· 2014 · cited 88,512x
- Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles
· 2005 · cited 48,837x
- Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
· 1976 · cited 44,827x
- Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
· 2021 · cited 43,586x
- Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water
· 1983 · cited 39,551x
via Crossref · CC0
Quotes
- “The strong appearance of design [in nature] allows a disarmingly simple argument: if it looks, walks and quacks like a duck, then, absent compelling evidence to the contrary, we have warrant to conclude it's a duck. Design should not be overlooked simply because it's so obvious.”
- “Under my definition, a scientific theory is a proposed explanation which focuses or points to physical, observable data and logical inferences. There are many things throughout the history of science which we now think to be incorrect which nonetheless would fit that — which would fit that definition. Yes, astrology is in fact one.”
- “... I have no reason to doubt that the universe is the billions of years old that physicists say it is. Further, I find the idea of common descent (that all organisms share a common ancestor) fairly convincing, and have no reason to doubt it. ... I think that evolutionary biologists have contributed enormously to our understanding of the world. Although Darwin's mechanism - natural selection working on variation - might explain many things, however, I do not believe it explains molecular life.”
- “As the number of unexplained, irreducibly complex biological systems increases, our confidence that Darwin’s criterion of failure has been met skyrockets toward the maximum that science allows.”
- “If a theory claims to be able to explain some phenomenon, but does not generate even an attempt at an explanation, then it should be banished.”
- “Many people, including many important and well-respected scientists, just don’t want there to be anything beyond nature. They don’t want a supernatural being to affect nature.”
via Wikiquote · CC BY-SA