Skip to content
EntityQ1345825· pop 22· linked from 435 articles

pseudoarchaeology

Sign in to save

Also known as alternative archaeology, fringe archaeology, fantastic archaeology, cult archaeology

Pseudoarchaeology (sometimes called fringe archaeology and previously also called alternative archaeology) consists of attempts to study, interpret, or teach about the subject-matter of archaeology while rejecting, ignoring, or misunderstanding the accepted data-gathering and analytical methods of the discipline. These pseudoscientific interpretations involve the use of artifacts, sites or materials to construct scientifically insubstantial theories to strengthen the pseudoarchaeologists' claims. Methods include exaggeration of evidence, dramatic or romanticized conclusions, use of fallacious

~39 min read

Encyclopedic overview

30 sections
Contents
  • Etymology
  • Description
  • Characteristics
  • Lack of scientific method
  • Opposition to the archaeological establishment
  • Academic archaeological responses
  • Conferences and anthologies
  • Inclusive attitudes
  • Historical pseudoarchaeology
  • Nationalist motivations
  • List of examples
  • Religious motivations
  • Examples
  • In Egyptology
  • Pyramids
  • Mummy curses
  • Pre-Columbian contact and Mayan connections
  • Flood theories and the Great Sphinx
  • The Mayas
  • Examples of Maya-related pseudoarchaeology
  • Other notable examples
  • Pseudoarchaeology books
  • Pseudoarchaeological television programs and series
  • Archaeological sites subject to pseudoarchaeological speculation
  • So-called out-of-place artefacts
  • See also
  • References
  • Works cited
  • Further reading
  • External links

Pseudoarchaeology (sometimes called fringe archaeology and previously also called alternative archaeology) consists of attempts to study, interpret, or teach about the subject-matter of archaeology while rejecting, ignoring, or misunderstanding the accepted data-gathering and analytical methods of the discipline. These pseudoscientific interpretations involve the use of artifacts, sites or materials to construct scientifically insubstantial theories to strengthen the pseudoarchaeologists' claims. Methods include exaggeration of evidence, dramatic or romanticized conclusions, use of fallacious arguments, and fabrication of evidence.

There is no unified pseudoarchaeological theory or method, but rather many different interpretations of the past which are jointly at odds with those developed by the scientific community as well as with each other. These include religious philosophies such as creationism or "creation science" that apply to the archaeology of historic periods such as those that would have included the supposed worldwide flood myth, the Genesis flood narrative, Nephilim, Noah's Ark, and the Tower of Babel. Some pseudoarchaeological theories concern the idea that prehistoric and ancient human societies were aided in their development by intelligent extraterrestrial life, an idea propagated by those such as Italian author Peter Kolosimo, French authors Louis Pauwels and Jacques Bergier in The Morning of the Magicians (1963), and Swiss author Erich von Däniken in Chariots of the Gods? (1968). Others instead argue there were human societies in the ancient period which were significantly technologically advanced, such as Atlantis, and this idea has been propagated by some people such as Graham Hancock in his publication Fingerprints of the Gods (1995). Pseudoarchaeology has also been manifest in Mayanism and the 2012 phenomenon.

Excerpted from Wikipedia’s “pseudoarchaeology” article, available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 licence.