Richard Dedekind

Person · Open Library

Born

1831

Died

1916

Works

46

via Open Library + Wikidata

Music · MusicBrainz

Type

Person

via MusicBrainz · CC0

Listeners · Last.fm

Listeners

3

Total plays

4

<a href="https://www.last.fm/music/Richard+Dedekind">Read more on Last.fm</a>

via Last.fm · Richard Dedekind

Recent publications · Crossref

5 total works indexed

1. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

   · 1977 · cited 63,319x

2. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools

   · 2009 · cited 59,223x

3. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform

   · 2009 · cited 47,643x

4. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database

   · 2009 · cited 47,248x

5. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold

   · 2021 · cited 43,565x

via Crossref · CC0

Quotes

• “What advantage will be gained by even a purely abstract definition of real numbers of a higher type, I am as yet unable to see, conceiving as I do of the domain of real numbers as complete in itself.”
• “The system R forms a well-arranged domain of one dimension extending to infinity on two opposite sides. What is meant by this is sufficiently indicated by my use of expressions borrowed from geometric ideas; but just for this reason it will be necessary to bring out clearly the corresponding purely arithmetic properties in order to avoid even the appearance as if arithmetic were in need of ideas foreign to it.”
• “If a, c are two different numbers, there are infinitely many different numbers lying between a, c.”
• “The way in which the irrational numbers are usually introduced is based directly upon the conception of extensive magnitudes—which itself is nowhere carefully defined—and explains number as the result of measuring such a magnitude by another of the same kind. Instead of this I demand that arithmetic shall be developed out of itself.”
• “That such comparisons with non-arithmetic notions have furnished the immediate occasion for the extension of the number-concept may, in a general way, be granted (though this was certainly not the case in the introduction of complex numbers); but this surely is no sufficient ground for introducing these foreign notions into arithmetic, the science of numbers.”
• “Just as negative and fractional rational numbers are formed by a new creation, and as the laws of operating with these numbers must and can be reduced to the laws of operating with positive integers, so we must endeavor completely to define irrational numbers by means of the rational numbers alone. The question only remains how to do this.”

via Wikiquote · CC BY-SA