Skip to content
ad hominem

File:Aristotle_Altemps_Inv8575.jpg · Wikimedia Commons · See Wikimedia Commons

EntityQ189183· pop 66· linked from 561 articles

ad hominem

Sign in to save

Also known as ad hominem fallacy, ad mulierem, ad feminam, argumentum ex concessis, ad hominem argument, To (attack) the man, abusive ad hominem, argumentum ad hominem

fallacious argumentative strategy that avoids genuine discussion of the topic by instead attacking the character, motive etc. of the person(s) associated with the argument

AI overview

An ad hominem argument attacks the person making a claim rather than addressing the actual claim itself, such as by insulting their character or questioning their motives. It matters because relying on this tactic prevents genuine discussion of the real issues and is considered a logical fallacy that weakens reasoning.

AI-generated from the Wikipedia summary — may contain errors.

Wikidata facts

Subclass of
genetic fallacy
Has part
tu quoque
Image
Ad Hominem Fallacy Icon.png
Show 2 more facts
different from
name calling
significant person
Richard Whately
Sources (3)

via Wikidata · CC0

~14 min read

Encyclopedic overview

Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem ('an argument to the person'), refers to when a speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion often using a totally irrelevant, but often highly charged attribute of the opponent's character or background. The most common form of this fallacy is "A" makes a claim of "fact", to which "B" asserts that "A" has a personal trait, quality or physical attribute that is repugnant thereby going off-topic, and hence "B" concludes that "A" has their "fact" wrong – without ever addressing the point of the debate.

Other uses of the term ad hominem are more traditional, referring to arguments tailored to fit a particular audience, and may be encountered in specialized philosophical usage. These typically refer to the dialectical strategy of using the target's own beliefs and arguments against them, while not agreeing with the validity of those beliefs and arguments. Ad hominem arguments were first studied in ancient Greece; John Locke revived the examination of ad hominem arguments in the 17th century.

Excerpted from Wikipedia’s “ad hominem” article, available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 licence.