protected intersection

Due to the nature of video presentation, not all concepts, statements and visuals are supported with the subtle details deserving of such a complex topic. Download the annotated transcript to the video , with footnotes and details about the design presented here. While the Protected Intersection design has promise, implementation is fraught with serious challenges. This site will identify and explore these issues with the goal of understand how and if these tools can be use on US streets. Known issues include: Intersection capacity implications of added bicycle signal phases. Non-MUTCD compliant signalization schemes, such as the leading bicycle interval. Truck turning requirements for freight movement. Bicyclist deflection at corner islands and impacts to operating speed. Interaction between bicyclists and pedestrians. Pedestrian deflection at crossings. Considerations for pedestrians with disabilities. See below for examples of intersections from around the world using similar elements to to the design shown here. These design elements are uncommon in the US, and have had limited professional or academic study here. Existing resources from bloggers, advocates, and students offer a great start to understanding these concepts further. Mark Wagenbuur’s 2011 video on dutch junction design presents a great summary of dutch practices at intersections. His excellent Bicycle Dutch blog is a fantastic resource across a wide spectrum of policies and practices that makes bicycling in the Netherlands so successful. Paul James’ blog about improving streets in the UK features a series of articles adapting Dutch design manual practices to UK conditions. See his post on Traffic-Controlled Junctions and Small Traffic Controlled Junctions for his discussion of these types of intersections. David Hembrow’s educational blog about bicycling infrastructure in the Netherlands features excellent presentation, discussion, and critique of bicycle infrastructure. A frequent critic of planners and engineers passing off custom designs as poor imitations of true dutch design, he offers Cycling Infrastructure Study Tours for those who want to learn about dutch design practices first hand. A class wiki page from Professor Peter Furth of Northeastern University breaks down the elements of dutch bicycle infrastructure. Students document, measure and reflect on the on-the-ground designs they experience first hand during their study abroad program. Key related pages include: Signalized Intersection with Cycle Tracks , and Dutch Intersection Design with Cycle Tracks . Mitigating the Right Turn Conflict Using Protected-Yet-Concurrent Phasing for Cycle Track and Pedestrian Crossings by Furth, P., Koonce, P., Miao, Y., Peng, F., Littman, M. submitted to the TRB 2014 annual meeting. This paper explores a “protected-yet-concurrent” phasing scheme in which right turns as well as left turns have their own phase. The bicycle crossing runs protected from the turn phases, yet concurrent with the parallel vehicular through phase. This phasing scheme is far more efficient than using an all-ped phase. Seven examples from the US illustrate the impacts of such a configuration. FHWA. MUTCD – Interim Approval for Optional Use of a Bicycle Signal Face (IA-16). 2013 The December 2013 Interim Approval for biycle signals opened the door for simplified implementation of bicycle signals under certain limited conditions. However, use of bicycle signals for simultaneous green or leading bicycle interval phasing is explicitly prohibited by the approval, and requires an experimentation process by the FHWA. This study compares three different strategies to cycle tracks at intersection approaches, including bending out the cycle track to create a setback crossing. The Pedler and Davies analysis focuses on minor street crossings, but their findings may also apply to larger intersections with permissive turns across the cycle track. The analysis describes the setback crossing a